Does this mean you support the President?

I recently heard audiotape of Cameron Diaz on some television sob-show warning that all who do not want rape to become legal in this country had better get out and vote.

I agree wholeheartedly.

Myself and other like-minded people would crawl over broken glass, if necessary, in order to vote to keep this from happening. Re-electing President Bush is crucial to this goal. For, if we lose to the jihadists, if they achieve their ultimate goal of bringing Shari'a to America, then rape will indeed be effectively lawful here as it is in countries which currently observe Shari'a.

How is this so? It is devilishly simple: In a Shari'a court, only the testimony of muslim men is admissible. As such, in any case involving illicit sex between a muslim man and a woman (muslim or not), the outcome of the case will depend entirely on the testimony of men. If the woman happens to be muslim then her husband or father may testify on her behalf, otherwise she has no voice at all in the proceedings. So unless the man confesses, or there are muslim men who can and will testify to guilt, there is no possibility whatever of a guilty verdict in a rape case.

Given these rules of evidence, and the severity of the penalties, how often do you believe that men are convicted of rape and the women are found innocent of wrongdoing in a Shari'a court? Do you also believe in the tooth fairy? More typically the result is like this.

When a muslim man has sex with a woman, she is, under Shari'a, unable to withhold consent because she cannot offer testimony in court to that effect. This is, in function, the same as making rape legal. There is effectively no rape under Shari'a, but only because every act which would be considered rape under English common law and under American case law is not recognized as a criminal act in a Shari'a court.

As if that is not enough. In any such case under Shari'a, the woman (or girl) involved can expect to get a death sentence, if not from the court, then from her family. You see, having apparently consented to such things, the woman (or girl) brings dishonor upon her family which can only be expunged by her death. This is called honor killing and muslims practice it everywhere there is Shari'a and many places where there is not.

Clash of civilizations? No. Anything which operates under the above rules cannot rightly be called civilization.

So yes, Cameron, it is vital that we vote.... for the man who is determined to take this war to the enemy and not John Kerry: a man who doesn't possess sufficient strategic vision to win at parchesi.